🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts about that comments delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, he invoked the ongoing absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and concussive strength on each forehand and reverse side are more than enough to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The last several years has seen the interesting rise of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of American men winning major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued break point after break point, extending the run to the point of frustration. When he finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and forced him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was fairly ironclad proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of the Serbian, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express his emotions or the strategy he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American told a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {